I was on my way home from work today, descending the last set of stairs to the south bound Northern Line platform at Leicester Square, when something ahead of me caught my attention. Watching my feet as I descended the stairs, something vaguely familiar entered my peripheral vision, and I looked up to focus on it, just in time to see a very shapely arse in a thin pair of tracksuit bottoms disappearing around the bend of the stairs.
This was no average ass. This was the proto-ass, of which all other asses are saggy, mis-shapen, inferior imitations. It didn't jiggle, or swing, it just bounced like a solid rubber ball, shifting up and down only ever so slightly as it disappeared rapidly from view. My appreciation of its qualities was significantly aided by the tracksuit bottoms, which were, as they all are, paper thin, and made of a silky material which slides easily, revealing contours in motion.
I guess it couldn't have been somebody I knew, I thought to myself, in the final seconds as I hit the bottom of the stairs. I don't know anybody who would wear tracksuit bottoms on the tube. In fact, I don't know anybody with an ass that good, full stop -- well, except for maybe my ex-housemate of 2 years ago, B. B always used to wear micro-thin pyjama bottoms around the house, an item of clothing that betters even tracksuit bottoms for ease of arse-appreciation. But B used to get off work an hour before I now do, and last I heard, he wore a suit to work.
It must have just been the ass itself that caught my attention, I decided. It was a very nice ass though, one that might be worth some mild tube-stalking. Quite easily done, strolling along the platform casually, locating the object of one's interest on the platform and standing a discreet distance away from its owner, making sure one is down-tube of your subject, thereby providing you with an excuse to frequently glance in that direction as you check the tunnel for a train. Tube stalking is every Londoner's hobby. Nothing sinister, just light entertainment as you wait two minutes for your tube to arrive.
However, today was not a good day to travel the Northern. Some sort of failure earlier in the afternoon had trains on the Charing Cross branch running with big 7-minute gaps, a recipe for packed trains and impassable platforms. So as I turned left at the bottom of the stairs, I discovered the platform too full to move anywhere. The owner of the ass had been similarly stopped, and so was immediately in front of me. The arse-possessor had apparently decided, instead of squeezing through the crowds to move along the platform, he would just stop in the entrance, blocking anyone behind him.
At this point, a total of perhaps seven seconds have elapsed since my attention was initally drawn at the top of the stairs. Vaguely irritated by his inconsiderate decision, I decided to abandon my tube-stalking plans (impractical anyway on such a crowded platform) and push past him. As I did so, I turned to glance at the owner of the arse, to at least check if the face did the posterior any justice.
And found myself face to face with ex-housemate B, with whom I then had a very pleasant twenty-minute chat.
Long-distance peripheral vision ass-recognition. Another highly-developed skill that I nevertheless cannot include on my CV.
Stephen
01 May 2006Most likely to be found blocking the path of a JCB.
Mikey
01 May 2006@Laurie: Spoken like a true anti-foody! Although they are indeed an inefficient use of space and electricty (none of which matters if you have plenty of both. and truth be told, unless you do you are a bit silly spending all that money on a bread-making machine) they are *not* an inefficient use of time. It's incredibly easy to make bread even without a bread-making machine, let alone with one. If you are hosting a dinner party the right choice of bread can be just as important as appropriately chosen wine. Unfortunately different types of bread aren't as easily available as different types of wine.
Ben
01 May 2006Re organic food, while the organic movement (like Greenpeace of late) has a rather nasty anti-Progress streak (such as their global ban on GMOs), it is undeniable that current industrial farming techniques with massive over-use of fertilizers and {herb,pest}icides have caused serious environmental problems. Countries that can afford to feed themselves without these things really should do so, and research should be directed towards making it possible for poorer countries to as well...
michael, StE
01 May 2006Sadly, he didn't.
ed
01 May 2006And I really don't understand what's wrong with making your own bread. Maybe the bread maker prefers the taste. Please do not condemn us all to eating nothing but M&S microwavable junk food and pre-packaged salads till the end of time due to the "effiency".
Laurie
02 May 2006@Ben: my main beef with organic farming (and the people who buy it) in the UK is that it is touted as the best way forward, coupled with fierce, unfounded opposition to GM foods.
If everybody switched back to organic farming, there would be massive food shortages. So instead the UK (and Europe in general) pay a premium price for organic food and starve GM food research of money and space to do research, thus prolonging the harmful effects of pesticides and fertilizers in the rest of the world by denying the poor of the world with any meaningful alternative.
@Ed: there is nothing wrong with organic food per se, just the knock-on economic effects it comes with, namely a lack of investment in GM foods.
Tom Williams
02 May 2006Also, re: squandering electricity - do you switch your computer off at night? How often do you switch your heating on? Do you use a tumbledryer for your clothes?
Tom Williams
02 May 2006On a similar note, my parents use a bread machine. They live 4 miles from the nearest shop selling bread. It's a lot more environmentally friendly than driving an eight-mile round trip.
marc
03 May 2006That was purely for comedic effect. I've never had organic peas.
Ade
03 May 2006A
Artemis
03 May 2006Laurie
03 May 2006Mikey
03 May 2006Colin
04 May 2006